Lyron
Operations · AI

AI-Powered Document Processing

Invoices, delivery notes, contracts: what someone retypes today gets read by a model – structured, checked against your master data and written straight into the target system. Your team only sees the cases where the extraction was uncertain.

Context

A validated data path

Document processing is often sold as magic: PDF in, data out. In practice it is a chain of three components – text recognition, layout analysis and a language model that maps recognised text to the right fields. That part works reliably today.

What decides between success and frustration is what happens afterwards. An extracted amount is worthless as long as nobody checks whether the supplier exists in your master data, whether net plus tax actually equals the gross amount, and whether there is a purchase order for the invoice at all. That validation is exactly the part most off-the-shelf tools leave open – and the part we build.

So we never deliver just an extraction. We deliver the complete path: from the intake channel through the validation rules and the approval step to a clean handover into your target system.

Use cases

Which documents are worth it

We always start with exactly one document type – the one with the highest volume. Others follow once the first runs stably.

Most common starting point

Incoming invoices

The most common starting point – and the one with the clearest business case, because it is retyped daily.

Invoice numberInvoice dateSupplier & VAT IDNet / tax / grossLine itemsPayment termsIBANPurchase order reference

Delivery notes & order confirmations

Most valuable in reconciliation: was what was ordered actually delivered – and is that what is being invoiced?

Delivery note numberOrder referenceArticle numbersQuantitiesDelivery date

Contracts

Less typing, more deadline control: the data lands in a calendar instead of a folder.

CounterpartyTermNotice periodRenewal clauseContract value

Forms & applications

Paper and PDF forms that are transferred into a mask today – leave requests, claims, intake forms.

Field valuesCheckboxesSignature presentAttachment completeness

Job applications & certificates

Structured storage instead of a pile of PDFs – a natural precursor to applicant tracking.

Contact detailsQualificationsCareer historyDegreesAvailability

Shipping & customs documents

Waybills, packing lists, certificates of origin – often with highly individual layouts per forwarder.

Shipment numberLine itemsWeightsCommodity codesConsignee
Example

What actually lands in your system

Schematic example for an incoming invoice: on the left the document as it arrives, on the right the fields your target system receives.

Extracted fields
  • SupplierMuster Stahl GmbH
  • VAT IDDE812345678
  • Invoice numberRE-2026-04871
  • Invoice date12/07/2026
  • Line itemsreview2 items
  • Net€4,820.00
  • VAT 19 %€915.80
  • Gross amount€5,735.80
  • Payment due26/07/2026
  • Order referenceBST-2026-1140

Hover a field: the highlight shows where on the document the value came from. That traceability is what separates a validated extraction from a guessed value.

Two line items fell below the confidence threshold and were routed to review – the document was not posted automatically.

How it works

How processing runs

  • Intake

    The document arrives where it already arrives today: a shared mailbox, a scan folder, a SharePoint library or an upload form. Nobody has to change habits.

  • Classification

    First we determine what it is. An invoice is treated differently from a delivery note – and unknown types land in the review queue instead of the target system.

  • Extraction

    The relevant fields are read out. Every field gets a confidence score: how certain is this mapping? That score is the basis for everything that follows.

  • Validation & approval

    Now it is calculated and reconciled: does the supplier exist? Does net plus tax equal gross? Is there a matching purchase order? Whatever fails becomes an approval task.

  • Handover

    Only at the end is anything written: a posting record to your accounting system, a record into the ERP, the file archived in an audit-proof way – with a log of who approved what and when.

Impact

What changes day to day

Today

  • Invoices are opened one by one from the shared mailbox and retyped
  • Transposed digits only surface during account reconciliation
  • Early payment discounts expire because invoices sit in approval for days
  • For any query, someone hunts for the original in the mail history
  • Month-end close depends on the one person who knows the pile

With a processing pipeline

  • Documents are classified, extracted and pre-coded automatically
  • Arithmetic errors and duplicates surface before posting, not after
  • Approvals run as tasks with deadlines – discount windows stay visible
  • Original, extracted values and approval log sit together
  • The process keeps running while the colleague is on holiday
Limits

Where the limits are – honestly

We do not sell full automation. We would rather clarify these four points before the quote than after go-live:

  • Handwriting stays unreliable. Printed documents are read very accurately; handwritten notes and signature fields are not. Where handwriting is decisive, a human stays in the process.
  • Poor originals stay poor data. A skewed phone photo of a creased copy is hard even for a good model. Often the most effective step is improving the intake side – for example a supplier who sends PDFs instead of paper from now on.
  • Unusual layouts need examples. For a supplier with an odd invoice structure and three documents a year, tuning rarely pays off. Those cases deliberately stay on manual entry.
  • 100 % automation is not a realistic goal – nor a sensible one. Realistic is: the bulk runs through, a remainder becomes a review task. For payment-relevant documents, approval stays with a human on principle.
Integrations

Works with your existing systems

DATEVSharePointMicrosoft 365n8nMicrosoft GraphERP systemsEmail
Scope and price

Scope and price

The entry price covers a complete processing pipeline for one document type. What pushes the price up, we tell you beforehand – not in the final invoice.

from €2,490 one-off
  • Analysis call using real sample documents from your day-to-day
  • One document type, one intake channel, one target system
  • Classification and extraction including confidence thresholds
  • Validation rules against your master and order data
  • Approval workflow for every borderline case
  • Audit-proof archiving with a full log
  • Documentation, handover session and 30 days of support

What increases the price

  • Additional document types beyond the first
  • Several target systems instead of one
  • High document volume with throughput and resilience requirements
  • Operation inside your own infrastructure instead of the cloud
  • Special cases such as foreign languages, multi-currency or deviating tax logic

Larger scenarios with several document types and target systems typically land in the range of our Workflow Enterprise package from €5,900. We quote the binding fixed price after the analysis call.

All prices excl. VAT · operation and further development optionally via a support package

Included

What you get

  • Production processing pipeline

    Set up from intake channel to target system and tested with real documents

  • Rule set and thresholds

    Documented: which checks run and at which confidence a human takes over

  • Approval interface for your team

    Borderline cases appear as a task with the original document next to it – no hunting in the mailbox

  • Documentation & handover

    Technical documentation, process description and a 60-minute training for the department

Questions & answers

Frequently asked questions about document processing

For clean, printed documents of a known type, field extraction is highly reliable. That is exactly why we do not work with a blanket percentage but with per-field confidence scores: anything below the agreed threshold goes to manual review. The relevant question is not “how accurate is the AI” but “how many documents does my team still have to touch” – and we answer that in the analysis call using your real documents.
Three nets catch it in sequence. First the confidence threshold: uncertain fields are not passed through at all. Second the arithmetic and master data check: if net plus tax does not match the gross amount, or the supplier is unknown, the process stops. Third, approval for anything that moves money. A misread amount is therefore never posted silently – it becomes a task.
Only if you want them to. By default we process inside the EU, and on request we set up a fully self-hosted configuration where no document leaves your infrastructure. That costs a little more setup effort and is often the right call for HR or client files.
No. The model choice is a configuration, not a foundation. We deliberately build so the language model can be swapped without rebuilding the pipeline – the same stance as in our MCP projects.
The processing itself neither makes you compliant nor prevents it – what matters is the archiving. So we store the original document unchanged, log every processing and approval step traceably, and write into your existing archive rather than opening a new one. The final assessment is your tax advisor's call.
Quite a lot. From 2027 far more structured invoices will arrive as XRechnung or ZUGFeRD – those do not need extraction at all, because the data already comes machine-readable. But the paper and PDF share will not vanish overnight. The sensible setup is an intake that accepts both. Details in our guide to the 2027 e-invoicing mandate.

Bring five real documents

In the free intro call we look at your actual documents – not sample files. Afterwards you know what share realistically runs through automatically and whether the project pays off for you.

Book a free intro call
Practical guide

Where AI document processing creates value in everyday work

Invoices, contracts and forms are classified, relevant fields are extracted and passed to business systems with traceable validation.

Three concrete operating scenarios to compare with your own process.
01

Capture invoice data

Supplier, number, dates and totals are extracted into structured fields and validated before handoff.

02

Pre-sort contracts

Contract type, parties, term and deadlines are identified and prepared for business review.

03

Process forms

Form entries move into CRM, ERP or case records without being typed again.

A strong fit when …

Recurring requests can be answered from approved knowledge while uncertain cases are handed to people with clear context.

  • You handle recurring documents using repeatable rules.
  • The intake, target system and accountable business role can be named clearly.
  • Exceptions are allowed to remain visible and move to people deliberately.
Transparent potential estimate

Estimate time savings with your own volume

The calculator uses 8 minutes today and 2 minutes after automation as fixed example assumptions. It does not replace process analysis.

Illustrative estimate based on the visible assumptions — not a guarantee.

45Hours per month
540Hours per year
Additional measures after launch Handling time Escalation rate Source coverage
Frequently asked questions

What decision-makers should know before starting

How does AI document processing work in practice?
A document arrives by email, upload or API. The workflow then validates the required data, runs approved steps and routes exceptions to the responsible person with context.
Which systems can be connected?
Typical integrations include Microsoft 365, SharePoint, DATEV, ERP, n8n. The decisive factors are a stable interface and clearly defined ownership of each data field, not a specific tool.
Which tasks deliberately stay with the team?
Unreadable documents, conflicting values and business decisions go to an owner with the relevant passages highlighted.
How is the automation introduced?
We start with a narrow knowledge and task scope, test real examples and expand only after documented approval. A tightly scoped first process typically takes 3–6 weeks; scope, interfaces and approvals determine the actual plan.
How can the benefit be measured?
Before implementation we record volume and current handling time. After launch we also compare Handling time, Escalation rate, Source coverage. The calculator on this page is a transparent estimate, not a promise.
Content reviewed on 26 July 2026 About Lyron AI